I think that the research that Harvett has done is to be commended, not criticised, we would not have even know about this infringement if Harvett had't picked up on it IMHO, but seeing as we are now partners in NOX and they've paid for past misgiving, perhaps the best thing now is to let it rest!
I think that the research that Harvett has done is to be...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 24 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NOX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
10.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $29.22M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 52445 | 10.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0¢ | 46575 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 11.05am 27/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NOX (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
