Ann: Appendix 3B, page-6

Whatsup, Forrest is the next drill target for whatever reason:

A drill test of an analogous “eastern limb-type” target (at Forrest), where a new conductor has been defined from reprocessed ground EM, is due to start before the end of this month.

Either, they are not confident about the Wodger conductor and Forrest is looking good enough to drill without further prep work or they are confident about Wodger but they are confident about Forrest too and as it's easier and quicker to drill, do F first.

W is > 500ms down. It can only be inferred of course, but Forrest looks like it's not deep. The ann gives no clue though, nor does it say whether it's RC or ????.

Let's hope that we get all of that sort of info soon, if only to keep the market interested.

This is a post I did yesterday on GTE. The 2010 DeGrussa paper that you can link to has been referenced by me before here a couple of times. It's well-worth a close read. Ridgy didge had posted that DeGrussa had been found because of an EM. It wasn't; it was geochemistry and drilling. The EMs came a bit later. This paper I reference discloses more about the 'what-ifs' though with DeG and EM.

https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/an...3836984/page-44?post_id=28916408#.WhCnALpuLcs.

Blythefan has ben posting over there too. The subject matter is an area that is not that far south of Doolgunna. This is an interesting extract from one of them (my emphasis):

'.....So I take GTE's interpretations on face value, and try to relate it to what I have seen in the basin (full disclosure, I work for a company with a project in this area, and no you won't find out who). This is mow my 4th go in the area..'