ADO 0.00% 2.1¢ anteotech ltd

Hi Smilez, Just my 2c, as I’ve been thinking about this as well....

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 1,728 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 174
    Hi Smilez, 


    Just my 2c, as I’ve been thinking about this as well.  I think it comes down to supply/demand with an emphasis on demand.  As others have said, being greedy in establishing our first deal would be foolhardy in many respects, and whilst you don’t want to de-value the product, rewarding an early adopter willing to work with us and sign a long-term deal would be my idea of a solid first step.  IF A-Bind can be established as a standard, then we look at subsequent deals at premium pricing.  


    Important to note, whilst the base tech remains the same, each applicae changes the formula (ie. cTnL assay, pregnancy tests, silicon/batteries, etc.).  Pricing of each unique formula for each unique deal should be considered.  It may be baselines for industry / test type / etc., but demand should be driving price unless I’m missing something.  In other words, pricing a 1 size fits all for unmodified A-Bind for different applications would be silly imho.


    Anywho, just thinking out loud.  Happy Friday!


    All IMHO, FWIW, DYOR, TFIF, blah blah blah...


 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add ADO (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.