Hi Smilez,
Just my 2c, as I’ve been thinking about this as well. I think it comes down to supply/demand with an emphasis on demand. As others have said, being greedy in establishing our first deal would be foolhardy in many respects, and whilst you don’t want to de-value the product, rewarding an early adopter willing to work with us and sign a long-term deal would be my idea of a solid first step. IF A-Bind can be established as a standard, then we look at subsequent deals at premium pricing.
Important to note, whilst the base tech remains the same, each applicae changes the formula (ie. cTnL assay, pregnancy tests, silicon/batteries, etc.). Pricing of each unique formula for each unique deal should be considered. It may be baselines for industry / test type / etc., but demand should be driving price unless I’m missing something. In other words, pricing a 1 size fits all for unmodified A-Bind for different applications would be silly imho.
Anywho, just thinking out loud. Happy Friday!
All IMHO, FWIW, DYOR, TFIF, blah blah blah...
New Feature Announcement!
We’re excited to introduce the DealRoom portal, now live on site, providing users with exciting access to private equity opportunities for both pre-IPO and publicly listed companies.
See full details by selecting the new menu item named 'DealRoom' on our main menu bar or click below.
Stay ahead of the market, with HotCopper.