Ann: Anteo Shareholder Presentation, page-162

Thanks for your "advice".

I have rarely complained about my losses and this gets misconstrued as continually complaining about them.

NOPE.

I'm interested in issues of governance. It's on the record here that I was warned off asking difficult questions. That aren't positive. That aren't forward thinking.

It's also on the record here that I tested the water about meeting up in a friendly way and got no response at all from Melbourne attendees. None.

The rudeness at the AGM was appalling. I explained I had an important meeting later in the afternoon of the preso, and I didn't want argy bargy and a repetition of previous experiences. (It went well btw.)

Someone from the company, (I'm assuming the person in charge of shareholder communications MS has had my posts moderated many times as being supposedly untrue), even though he wasn't party to conversations that I had. What's the need for this level of control? It's bizarre. All this contributes to the reality that I would have been given short shrift at the preso which I was instructed, had to be positive and about the future.

It's not about the company making themselves available for accountability is it?

Now I have posted comments that are critical of the company, and they go over like a lead balloon.

This shows a mentality of shoot the messenger.