Thanks Andrew, for avoidance of doubt, the intent is not to lump...

Thanks Andrew, for avoidance of doubt, the intent is not to lump LVT alongside BIG. It is the unconventional reporting and disclosure and inconsistencies in the choice of Revenue terms that is the subject of contention. And for LVT's ASR whether committed equates to contractual because that is important and should be closely watched in forthcoming statutory accounts. Validation is there when the reported statutory revenues bears closer semblance to the ASR growth, I don't think it is an issue but nothing is to be taken for granted.