Ann: Annual Report to shareholders, page-20

The point is that there's a difference between stating the company has a multi-mine strategy and acknowledging that there is capacity for multi-mine operations in the future (old management vs new management). It's all part of the discussion where a recurring theme from posters seems to be... we've heard this all before - don't believe it now.

Speculate all you like on the timing of my posts and I'll take your opinion on investment strategy on board - although neither are relevant to this discussion - nor of any real value.

I'm aware of SoG and ATW but I'm not sure of your point about them? That they too failed to capitalise on the ore body? Or there are no new resource surprises likely from that tenement?

Would you rather learn about the MoU or prefer it to be kept quiet? Maybe you feel the MoU shouldn't even have been entered into - regardless of the conditions outlined? (I'm not being an A-hole on this one, genuinely interested.)

I know the SP for me isn't sinking, it's remained fairly steadily in the red for the last 2 years. Thus the decision to let her ride, let it play out and back the new management team.

I don't think our views are far apart.