Forty, I know you and a few past posters have a bee in the bonnet about the "share structure", personally I don't give it a lot of thought (you asked me my opinion). I concentrate on the projects, leases, resource, samples, neighbours etc. I reckon the "share structure" (if that relates to numbers of shares issued etc will self correct once the fundamentals are proven up. Does it make a lot of difference if we have 2b shares at .002c or 200m shares at .02c, isn't the share capital in this example the same?
Along the same lines, if the project is right then the funding will be right - kinda 'if you build it, they will come' (apologies the Kevin Costner). So, in short, I'm quite comfortable with where we're at and where it seems we're heading. I'm no geologist but the Chilean project looks like a beauty to me and I count down the days re our Qld zinc project and our next door neighbours who have a heap of infrastructure but a daily depleting resource.
RMG Price at posting:
0.2¢ Sentiment: ST Buy Disclosure: Held
