Ann: Analytical Method and Permitting Update, page-25

What a load of crap. Which part of "assaying of drill-hole samples will commence in late-March" don't you understand? Do you really think people will believe you instead of what's been stated in the ANN to be weeks away?

The imminent assay results (multi-ounce AuEq IMO) will settle a lot of non-arguments about how much the partial extraction results have been undercalling the grade to this point. The results on Nov 26 give us an indication that it should be a pretty huge upgrade.

Another thing that I think a lot of people are missing is that the SP won't be affected much either way by the mining startup date. It doesn't matter when we commence mining. The important thing is that we have the ability to mine or exploit these deposits. IMO they have demonstrated that they have the ability.

Keep in mind that the assay results that should be mineralised from collar to EOH will only be for a handful of holes testing a tiny speck representing less than 0.1% of the potential volume of these massive mineralised intrusions, but don't take my word for it. The BBX geos point out that the whole intrusion is mineralised in their graphic:






This is what the drill tested volume looks like in a schematic using Tres Estados as the example: