More detail, yes. More clarity (to me at least), no!
Anyone care to explain the significance of the extra details in these two anns. Is the main difference the estimated 40% average sulphide content? (And 30% in the other ann.) If so, are these percentages higher or lower than expected? Or are they just reinforcing that there are even more similarities in these samples relative to the Marley and Vardy ore zones?
Ann: Amendment of 23 April Drilling Update, page-4
Add AML (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $5.482M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
| AML (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
