Ann: Amended Appendix 5B December 2018 Quarter, page-25

Mate, you have got it all wrong. Perhaps you should go back through most of my posts and I am sure you will change your mind and possibly correct what you have just written.

If you do so, you will soon realise that I call this dog and a dog with a huge amount of fleas a very long time ago. Years as a matter of facts, and where I stated that I was selling and reducing my investment in this company because I was of the opinion that it was a big scam. Yet again and considering the 55 posts you have made since joining HC, one can understand that you are talking without doing any proper research. Could it be that the nepotism factor is coming out now.??

I also made it clear that the amount of shares I have left were just a token amount and possibly not even allowing me of buying myself a carton of beer which I would have given to whoever wanted it because I don't drink.

Now, as for the following part, you have got it all wrong again.

For your records, ASIC and the ASX have a duty to keep an eye on companies and especially companies the likes of CDU........................(NOT LOOKING THE OTHER WAY), while all for the benefits of the shareholders. Here they have failed dismally while allowing all the rort that is going on. They are the regulators are they not.??

Regardless of as to where CDU got the money from, the reality of it all is that the ASX and ASIC should have put the brakes on CDU long before all this crap started and raised it's ugly head. That is where both of our Regulators have failed. They failed in their duties to protect the shareholders/investors and IMHO they are failing still for letting this company to continue to trade (Or Better Still To Continue To Be Listed), when they have nothing going for them. They are full of debts, they are in a way that they have everything tied up in security to everyone else and, most importantly and IMO, they are allowing this BOD's to stay in there collecting huge fees while possibly even allowing them to continue to be listed when chances are that they insolvent. A quick look at their last quarterly speaks for plenty IMO.

Again you are juts having a wild stab in saying that I am a trader. I am not a short term trader and have held shares in this company even before it changed it's name to Cudeco. Yet again coming from you with what is shown in your sentiment and disclosure one can understand. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black ROFLMAO..

Anyway, my suggestion to you is that you do some proper research before you resort yourself to write such a baseless and provoking crap.

As for you last paragraph, well mate another one of those short and sweet attempt at flaming and baiting me. Many thanks but no thanks.

In the future can you please refrain from doing so because if you don't I will refer your flaming to the MODS.

Cheers