The evidence a shareholder in UCM would need is they can benefit from the code, happy if you can prove my understanding wrong. Simple test.
The CPT 1 code application is an upgrade to the existing CPT 111 code approved by AMA in 2012 which is used for atcor machines.
Ie the test of whether there is any benefit of the CPT1 code for UCM is whether they can currently claim reimbursement under the CPT 111 code today?
The evidence a shareholder in UCM would need is they can benefit...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add UCM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
3.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.506M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 150000 | 1.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 3.2¢ | 200000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 29/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| UCM (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
