well, as a new comer, i can only comment that 20c to 3c, was a...

well, as a new comer, i can only comment that 20c to 3c, was a failure into zinc. As well the flood gate of escrows being released. Thats like a tsunami. Holders who are emotionally spent, could be part of the small volume selling, had a gut full, letting emotions say enough is enough , is what creates that under-priced environment from the 3.7c.

There was a 1.6m placement at 10c in the interim,,

I wasnt here when the zinc assets were acquired, or being discussed. I'm not sure how the Zinc assets attracted so much of our attention, but they are duds as i see it. Our priority is now imo rightly focused on the Vanadium, with a clear path to rationalize a higher valuation in peer comparison best in class tenure.
There is no mention of zinc in our current presentation / strategy. Assume they are binned.

but look at where we are, and at what price point the directors, and Peter Wall put 200k in, 3.7c

Yes, , agree, not well done for the zinc, but definitely well done for this land grab. Onto a good thing, grab it with both hands.