The fact that they mention this was identified during due diligence, don’t you think these were identified to try to reduce the acquisition price? Or is it simply to reduce the acquisition multiple? Considering the wilsons are the ones buying this largely, don’t you think they would be focused on the price rather than selling it to the market?
The fact that they mention this was identified during due...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 62 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add REH (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$25.76 |
Change
0.150(0.59%) |
Mkt cap ! $18.39B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $25.74 | $25.93 | $25.61 | $761.7K | 29.54K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 198 | $25.76 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $25.78 | 253 | 13 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 11.39am 28/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| REH (ASX) Chart |
