Trust me, I am not "complaining" just for the sake of it my friend. Why is what I say not 100% valid? Many exisiting shareholders, including instos or others who were not offered stock in the 40 million will have more than $66,000 plus of HSN. Why does what I say justify the use of ASX rule 7.1. as it appears to be in this case to the detriment of exisiting holders with large holdings over $66,000? (IMHO). Every individual share has equal rights to voting and dividends. Correct? So why not to a CR opportunity?
Trust me, I am not "complaining" just for the sake of it my...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 51 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add HSN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$5.77 |
Change
0.070(1.23%) |
Mkt cap ! $881.1M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $5.76 | $5.84 | $5.70 | $2.109M | 365.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1507 | $5.77 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $5.78 | 1104 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 27/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| HSN (ASX) Chart |
