I’m a bit bored so I’d probably ignore the ramblings below if...

I’m a bit bored so I’d probably ignore the ramblings below if time poor..

Just rereading that Ann - so hole 3 hit 52m at 1.5% from 232m... so 232m-284m is where the mineralisation lies.

You’ve then got hole 8 which is 400m west of hole 3 hitting visible mineralisation from 230m - same depth. You can see the core from hole 8 in picture 3 of the announcement which is from 263-266m downhole. This shows hole 8 has hit at least 35m+ of mineralisation from same depth as hole 3.

If that is the same mineralisation in hole 8 as 3 - it could potentially prove an orebody that is 50m deep and >500m long. If we assume 500m long x 500m wide x 50m deep we’ve got an area of 12.5 million cubic meters which using a density of 3kg per cubic meter could hold 40mt @ 1.5% Cu.. all speculative atm but that would be a handy resource and easy to mine if it is flat lying from that depth! Looking forward to more assays.