cheers dyeman , as I stated in my post if the sun was out 24...

cheers dyeman , as I stated in my post if the sun was out 24 hours a day for 3 months it would be 2000 operational hours at 90% uptime , an obvious impossibility so is it wise calling the plant a 50 MWH plant when it really is more like a 20 MWH coal fired plant that can run continuously .?

Would be nice to see a business case for GNX's solar based on the latest figures , ie showing profit per annum , and return per share currently and also once Kidstone kicks in where there would be a premium paid for power created during high demand periods guessing late evening , early morning when renewables are not producing much

(thanks for the link interesting to see how competitive solar and wind are becoming )