Todays announcement was another step in the right direction for...

Todays announcement was another step in the right direction for management and what your saying may be the case, but you mentioning your previous post is somewhat bewildering.
Considering that you felt the need to challenge some of my previous posts on accuracy or how I estimated time lines etc, (post #32683333) as you asked questions directly I offered you the manners of replying (post #32705779 and post #32707552) you have felt no inclination of returning the gesture.

So I will suggest how can we trust your opinions if you couldn't offer an explanation on predictions etc in post #32741557

Further you are suggesting "we have good grade of lithium in the saprolite section" (which is seen around 33m all around at the drilling location) when it is analysed," so we really don't know what the grades are just yet.......
Also it isn't necessarily the case that "concentrated grab samples" taken from trenches will be a representative of grades we will see in the cores.

"Between 61.7m and 87.7m (down hole depth) a 26m (down hole width) massive pegmatite showing varying amounts of silicification was intersected."


From Gerard King comments: "No analytical results are available at present and commentary to date is based principally on visual assessment of core."

@TheSower a JORC??? After 3 holes and no assays???


All IMO

Cheers