Look, I agree this is not a super complex tech, most military...

Look, I agree this is not a super complex tech, most military agencies are able to internally develop the drone gun tech themselves, Chinese, Russian can have a crack at this easily. But not every customer is military client, and not every country can develop this. There are definitely a huge market out there, the more drones get sold, the more counter measure is needed.

I don't see mobile drone gun as a key driver in this even this is brought out all the time. 1st, it needs human operation, which involves delays and manual errors, in the battle field when troops are mobile, sure it makes sense. But mostly of the time when we talk about protections against UAV, I think of airport, stadium, central railway stations, CBDs, and passive sentry can be 24/7 effortless and efficient.

This is where DRO has been known for so far, not the gun, but sentry.

in regards to IXI, man, it looks good! it looks futurist, straight out of a video game, it's a winner by the look at least.

It's a winner here given it's the only drone gun out of its category showing up in the media covering U5G, probably due to its visual attractiveness too. But I'm not that concerned.

DRO has done a lot of homework, it will be paid off, when at the right marketing direction.