Bootleg, Thanks for the reply - been away for Australia Day! In...

Bootleg, Thanks for the reply - been away for Australia Day! In response:

1) I take the view that AGU are a substantail shareholder of Amitan and the outcome of any meeting may have a price sensitive impact on AGU so any new directorship should have to be announced by AGU under their duty of disclosure for a publicly listed company.

2) Think the matter should have been (or maybe has been??) referred to ASIC on the grounds that the shares were issued to related parties which did not disclose their interests. I believe ASIC have the power to cancel the stock with no financial compensation to the holder. Also believe it would be considered an offence and could be tried through the civil court.

3) Vautex put some info on here about the leases so if he has them then AGU surely do. I want to know why AGU are still going through with this deal in this market - either there is something to benefit from or not but at least they could get out in front of us holders and open their books for inspection.

4) Remta has to do something soon or he is liable to get the flick too as I don't think he holds the balance of power - others do and they may be getting frustrated too - I know I am.

Cheers...