I want to clarify some of the comments you make here, in case they are misinterpreted by other readers who weren't present
One shareholder totally challenged their direction and said what we are all feeling.
Peter (the major shareholder) absolutely challenged the Board's market engagement strategy (or lack thereof) - agreed. While his comments may have voiced your perspective, I personally agreed with very little of what he said and can't say his was the voice of all others present.
They said they will rectify this and then talked of a SP of $1.80
to be clear
* the Chairman and the CEO, on many occasions, agreed they had not paid enough attention to activities that would promote market interest in the stock and would rectify this by engaging an IR/PR firm to assist.
* The major shareholder, mentioned above, talked of a SP of $1.80, not the chairman nor the CEO.
These comments might seem pedantic on my part, but clarity is important. FWIW, the figure of $1.80 had as much relevance to anything as $3.00, $5.00 or $200, in my opinion. (ie none)
Expand
