Well you show me Werble - in which announcement to the market did the Company qualify that:
by saying that VG was "derisked", what it really meant was that it was high risk?
by saying that VG was proven to be safe and effective,what it really meant was it was not proven to be effective at all?
Also, can you explain to me how, in conducting a trial with patients given VG plus standard care, you can say that the results showed that VG performed no better than standard care? Isnt that like saying, if I added my special formula to petrol and the car performed no better than it would with plain petrol, that the special formula performed no better than petrol?