AGM - Friday 23rd Novemeber, page-18

@ckchristian not in the slightest ...

I thought I explained myself fairly well ... What does that single shark camera on the river / beach earn us ? The builder contract was around $60K from memory ? None of these deals are going to put SP3 on the map, whether that be from an investment point of view or from a prospective customer point of view

Wanting the company to chase bigger contracts and IMO, much better suited ones is in no way chasing a pump and dump. The below diagram was one I knocked up for Tier 2 Recreational Cannabis Farm in Oregon that was interested in the technology. 8 cameras there alone and that is a tiny property ... As I said, Aurora and Canopy have greenhouses 20 times this size





Even securing a pilot with a major cannabis company, or actually to supply a Tier II farm, it will open them up to an enormous new market they probably hadn't already thought of. You get Canopy or Aurora using your technology, there will be 5-10 others come signing up the next day

Having one of these company takes on the technology isn't "spivvy", part of their licensing depends on having adequate security so it would be enormous validation of the technology

The market is completely ignoring the underlying growth we are achieving. 40% growth on last quarter, looks like we will be CF+ in January quarter perhaps and yet under IPO price

My point is, they can continue to build the solid foundation (as they are), whilst concurrently chasing big ticket items. Appoint a cannabis 'name' to explore "high value crop protection opportunities", tell them land us a deal with major for pilot/sale and incentivise them in stock options .. this isn't rocket science.