agm feedback, page-2

Hi bbv

As LT holder you should have nerves of steel by now and expect nothing but a stunning performance from the top table......and an invitation to their option conversion party in July.....assuming of course that we all have tickets..... remember it is the delivery system that is under trial. There is no doubt (in my mind at least) that the what is delivered has in the past been proven in the past.

I have been trying to understand and get a handle on theWHO process for acceptance of ArTiMist and from what I have read my understanding that the trial results themselves are sufficient proof of ArTiMist. WHO are more interested in the manufacturing process and the standard of the facility that carries out the manufacture. With this in mind it is really good to see that this has been addressed by SC and the plant modifications and initial batch manufacture is under control. Can anyone confirm that i have got this bit right?
Hopefully today we may have some clarification on the BP status to remove that annoying black cloud.

It appears that the facility inspection may be carried out by one person, so hopefully as we are contracting to a proven manufacturer of medical products the inspection process will not be too long or onerous. I just had the thought about modifications to the plant....there has been no mention of the cost of the work and who is paying for the work....in which case I assume it is the manufacturer...in which case what a vote of confidence for the expectation of a long term relationship...just a thought.

I will be on tenterhooks waiting for feed back from the meeting.

Good luck all

kippax