AGM and the way forward..., page-48

I see you are involved with BLK. Tolga wasn't involved with that one that went up to a $1 and now at under 5c. The point being that you can make a case for and against over a hundred plus small caps here of what went right and what went wrong, who was involved and what the game is. I never got involved with EUC because the exploration was very early stage, needed to be proved up, had a long way to go (proven correct), was hard to access and an unknown quantity and quality. Still think it will get there but it was early stage stuff.

If you want a more accurate picture of a Tolga involvment comparison for CAY and its resource, check out what he achieved with SYR. The punters that got involved with SYR early on made millions. Same story unfolding here imo but the difference is that due to a looming shortage of high grade bauxite, CAY will be taken over sometime in 2019 again imo. So the punters will get the $$ a lot quicker. I base these IMOs on having done a lot more research than what pops up on HC and actually going out and having discussions with ALL those involved in the company.

I can recommnd you re-read Kalenn's posts over the past month or so here. That's the guy that actually went to the company AGM, that has sort out those in and around CAY for meetings and discussions more than once, the guy who is actually going to Cameroon in early 2019 to do his own DD to back up his research (and geology studies at university). I've done a quarter of his research and met with the decision makers and those you have a shot at in your post and come to the same conclusion as he has. Maybe it is a matter of knowing which questions to ask and who to ask.