Originally posted by siddley
Yes and it only cost us 10% of the company.
They were forced into that move obviously due to the actions of the Browns. The Browns must have threatened the company with the 249 and they took that defensive move which is why is was never discussed.
Thank the Browns for the 11c sp but hopefully it's now behind us and the company can move forward.
Businesses are built on relationships and stability. You may not like the current BOD but the alternative was always going to be worse.
Who would invest in a company where there's shareholder revolt.
I would suggest they get a new chair after mid 2019 because of the waiting game for permitting.