More BS. I don't wish to bore the HC readers, but once again you have misquoted me in attemt to support your narative - I'll just point some more clangers out - so they can make up theur own minds if they haven't already.
"Surely it's bordering on inside information for you to have known that feelers were being put out to replace Stefan when he was still in the job. It wasn't known to the market. I seriously doubt if it was known to Stefan."
"Dr Stefan Enderling, has submitted his resignation as CEO to the Company. Dr Enderling, who was appointed effective January 1, has determined that for family reasons he can no longer meet the needs of the role. Dr Enderling will support the company in any required transition arrangements and step down as CEO on the 27th April 2018. The Company is pleased to announce that Mr Christopher Parker will be appointed as CEO commencing April 23, 2018" Annc. 9th Apr 2018 - Do yorself a favour & just go through the timing & HC will you SE did the tight thing and gave sufficient notice to allow a replacement to be found - he did not just wakeup one morning & not feel like going into work.
"finally concede it was within the rules." NOPE - I've said that from the outset, even said I'd seen it before and gave an example.
"Now finally this concession: "Yes short-term, revenue wise, Battery IP is the most prospective." "
Really are that desperate to appear "winning" - Once again I've been consistent and have referred other posters to the Nov SH update for timelines.
But hey your total disrespect for facts & details, particularly if they counter your narrative, is nothing new .
"Rameez suppsedly not knowing about sharks" That's so far from that exchange that I wonder that can you actually read anything with perspective - not bias. Maybe less scrolling (ie ignoring) and more comprehension woild not go astray. But hey - your disrespect for facts & details, particularly if they counter your narrative, is nothing new. Hey the best bit ". What bothers you is that I'm here as a brake on rampant and wild speculation to new entrants. And if it didn't bother you, you simply wouldn't engage. Fact." That's just sad on many levels narcissism included, and your continued reference to "winning" but hey it might be sport to you, but I'll stick to the facts and just keep correcting BS, and the tank topper - the fictional history you put up on the Canadian financials is nothing but "wild speculation" on your behalf.
Just like current holders I doubt new entries would put any truck on Fictional histories and particularly on Management and Events long long gone. However, you've now clearly open up about your motive behind you narrative.
As 4 Splen & grandma - that vitriolic diatribe above just goes to show it don't mean the message within is valid - gooda grandma or not.
Hey I gave links & supportive info (eg JH was a Finger Bros Strategic Transaction Advisor) did you "scroll" that one, so have got any links to back that wild speculation? Else its just DV diatribe.
ADO Price at posting:
1.3¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
(20min delay)
