It's funny that you lob insults at me so often. Strangely it's...

It's funny that you lob insults at me so often. Strangely it's your posts which resemble the need to score king hits. I make my points as neutrally as possible. Plus my spelling, grammar and syntax are pretty good.

It's you who continually overreaches. (At last silent on the issue of Rameez suppsedly not knowing about sharks!).

But you repeatedly ignore my positive statements on ADO, as if they didn't exist. Now finally this concession:


Yes short-term, revenue wise, Battery IP is the most prospective.

Understatement of the decade. For ADO's decade that is. They've pssed up against the wall investor's hard earned cash with broken dreams and promises on diagnostics...and now it's all about batteries. It's been obvious for a long time that Diagnostics wasn't going to work, and it became obvious to Diasource.
What did ADO promise to Diasource to get the deal over the line in the first place? Hurrell was simply a Director and NOT in the box seat over this. If you keep claiming he was it's a very borderline accusation indeed.

There is no indication that diagnostics will be a good revenue earner in the future. They simply refused to talk about barriers to adoption in the first place and continue that line. Nor market size we can realitically gain. Or % of the clip tickets (remember that trope?)

The amount of rubbish that was posted about the snowball effects etc of diagnostics takeups in here... mountainous.

Back to basics.
Surely it's bordering on inside information for you to have known that feelers were being put out to replace Stefan when he was still in the job.
It wasn't known to the market. I seriously doubt if it was known to Stefan.

Reassuring me that I should have the same contacts in recruitment as you doesn't change that. Because the market doesn't have it either. You shouldn't have known that little fact in advance. Bragging about it is standard practice though, and sometimes these little things might trip you up.

It may surprise you but I have nobody in here on ignore. Nobody! I hardly use it because I find it easy to scroll down. Apparently others find that too challenging.

Conspiracies?

I'm talking about the conspiracies you and others claim to have involved Ferghana partners, Hurrell, and peddled as fact. This swayed people and votes.

The fact is that after the attempted takeover, it became evident that ADO couldn't fund it's own trip to the loo. Indeed prior to the takeover, funding things were beyond dicey. With the sudden dropping by the Canadians of the funding deal, and switching to tougher terms.

Because of the very last minute roadblock, this HAD to have been due to something the Canadians discovered at the due diligence stage. That isn't wild speculation, it's how financing works. What was it?

You never seem to turn your mind to those details. Instead you rain down irrelevancies.

For example you drag up the AGM voting procedures yet again, but finally concede it was within the rules. Yes. it was always within the rules. Simple.

But so many believed otherwise! They believed it fervently, and threatened ASIC.

Numbers holding mistaken beliefs don't bother me, I recognise that truths are not validated by numbers. That's why being ignored by so many is faintly amusing.

What bothers you is that I'm here as a brake on rampant and wild speculation to new entrants. And if it didn't bother you, you simply wouldn't engage. Fact.

I have persistently wanted to know if ADO can manage to finance the activities to gain traction in batteries. At some stage we're going to run out of money. That's not fantasy, it's fact.

Sorry if I ever get in the way of someone's trades. But nothing is going to move this unless the company finally gets some traction on batteries and applies good governance.

I hope and trust we can get people of the calibre of Alan Studley into ADO again. I think there's a fair to even chance that the people in there now are a cut above Geoff Cumming and Richard Martin when they held significant roles.