Yep this post is typically why folk don't rate you posts DV....

Yep this post is typically why folk don't rate you posts DV.

Misquotations, & unsupported assumptions. Let alone your frequent Trumpesque usage of "winning" - like its a High School debating tournament.

"Of course it's speculative. And logical. It's entirely valid as any other speculation which goes on in here. Some of which involves ignorance of key relevant facts and involve leaps of logic from that." ------ Credo quia absurdum.
This flys in the face of your assertions of "extensive" "critical analysis", I certianly would have been sent packing had I tendered reports to board members couched in those terms.

Ok so to start with (engage), I said Management (and BTW also at an Operation level) not Executive ----

CEO positions are rarely advertised, its more a headhunting exercise and when not networked are typically outsourced either way feelers get put out - common folk find out. As for "common knowledge", if folk care to search HC they'll find that you have continually misquoted when applying those words in an argumentive context on SE's departure. One supportive fact did I put up was that there was no public Real Estate listing to support a family move to SEQ.

Sure folk have pointed out that JH was a Ferghana Consultant or as they say as a "Strategic Transaction Advisor, Diagnostics/Tools Sector, to augment the firm's scientific expertise." Link , and that this was never directly disclosed to the Market by JH - that's a fact. Its also common knowledge and on the record, that JH tried to pull a swifty at the AGM with a hands up vote in the face of an overwhelming resolution ballot return. Yes it's technically in the rules, but likewise it's hard to see that as "good governance" as well.

Now, I cannot say as why JH did not join the underwriting, and/ or placement in the Diasource M&A funding as did GC, RM, & JN, but the fact is he did not, and yes maybe it was even to avoid conflict of interest as a Strategic Transaction Advisor to Ferghana.

Yes it was a 3Y oversight and as I said no real biggy as it was just lapsed options - (minor effect on placement capacities under 7.1, but to SH advantage) - it does however erode claims to "good governance" under JH.

Batteries - "main chance" - well maybe you have a lot of folk on ignore, but POC & LFIA feature highly as Anteo products in folks minds. Indeed the recent Roadshow was 50/50% content. Yes short-term, revenue wise, Battery IP is the most prospective.


I acknowledged that ADO has been shorted and ASIC considers indicative unreported shorting going on as well (link nope - but my private mail). I am not however aware of any secret society or cabal railing against you. Nor for that matter sinister works behind the scenes to oust AS & JH as you have variously posted. The thing is little of your assumption based statements have gained any truck on HC - however if you can put up real and supportive facts, information and links as roundly requested - then as I said there can be NO conjecture.