Precisely where did I say that Stefan was going into another...

Precisely where did I say that Stefan was going into another Executive role?

I didn't.

Because Stefan was indeed relatively inexperienced in that level (a fact that you imagine I'm totally unaware of) but has expertise in the battery space, (given that batteries is now finally agreed upon as the main chance for ADO by the crowd in here it was a smart move) you'd expect he'd need a mentor.

And if your mentor is under threat, you might have second thoughts....and keep the door open back in Adelaide. To keep your disruption of your family to an absolute minimum while you work out if this is going to resolve well (for him) or not.

This was my thinking.

Of course it's speculative. And logical. It's entirely valid as any other speculation which goes on in here. Some of which involves ignorance of key relevant facts and involve leaps of logic from that.

But what was funny about the situation is that you claimed it was 'common knowledge' that Stefan was being replaced. When pressed on the point, you demurred and said, uh well, people in recruitment knew. It wasn't public knowledge then, was it? Which was my point.

Never mind. The other major point on the supposed conspiracy re Diasource you ignore for good reason. Because just conjecture and the logical leap that said that because Hurrel was a consultant to Ferghana Partners (ON THE SCIENCE!) he was brainstorming the Diasource takeover.

Bizarrely missing the point that you can have a function within an organisation that doesn't overlap other functions.

It's like saying GC was mastermind in Roche International. Whereas he had a smaller function in the SE Asia region. Basically a glorified salesman, but these crucial failures of logic and factual information just slide off your wetsuit. At least you're not insulting Rameez on his ignorance of sharks.

As for the reporting times...the forensic causes of an event usually occur well before they get reported on. This is basic comprehension.

"Oopsie"? Just because you assume you're winning, no need to go to kiddie level.

Don't assume because I don't return fire on your "reviews" I'm short of matching adjectives.


As for being required to provide links for each and every point made, it's not a requirement you have for anyone else, including yourself. Think it over.