@freeheel Well 8D was better than 1D, so I was expecting this...

@freeheel

Well 8D was better than 1D, so I was expecting this row of results to be good, admittedly not so good to the west of Section #1 which has been a nice surprise in 24D & 25D.

It will be interesting to see if the zone is thicker or thinner when they drill those 50M spaced holes. So will 8D be the better location or will it be 50M north or 50M south of that?

Once that's been answered it should be easier to work out the size of the deposit in MT's.

What was disappointing is to now know that they didn't publish those other RC assay results (19-23) because the results weren't that good (as per the MTR Interview) !!

LOTM