fluffynymph...Read again, they did not quote results from the...

fluffynymph...

Read again, they did not quote results from the XRF, just that it supported the geologists "visual" call on the rest of the hole.

I actually see this a a fairly conservative approach.

As for the top half of the hole, the results released were actually from lab assay...and the grades are good for a porphyry and marginally higher grade than the RC discovery hole, which lends weight to the Porphyry model, which we would expect to increase at depth. Further, I concur with their geos the core, with at least 4 separate breccia events (clasts from 4 different rock types/events), is somewhat "unusual".

I wonder if they have tested for other elements...Au?

Cheers!