spider your latex is to tightwhen did I ever mention an...

spider your latex is to tight

when did I ever mention an Australian listed funder.

The postings here from MMX supporters are becoming more and more desperate as 30 March approaches.

If we want to get on the band wagon of appropriate disclosure lets ask

- why has MMX wording changed so dramatically in relation to this case. It now reads like they admit something went on but they dont believe there is a claim againt the assets. Big change from Paul on this one.

- secondly why has MMX not disclosed anything about the Koh and Evans case which is a claim for 5% of the asset or effectively 10% of the Crossland shares. MMX silence on this represents a serious lack of disclosure. This one is coming up in August.

The parties worried about CHM here are MMX shareholders hoping what potentially is their worst nightmare will go away.

I also heard a rumour that the Wickeby issue is just another nightmare that MMX co-defendents have dragged MMX into and has nothing to do with the current management of CHM. I am sure CHM will be fuly co-operating on this.