You didn't say for 11 years. You said 'time and time again'. I...

You didn't say for 11 years. You said 'time and time again'. I simply pointed out that SGH was a very good investment for 8 years. Through 11 years, 8 of those years would have produced a very a good return for someone, I think. Some 'savvy' or 'lucky' investors(s) would be very happy with their SGH investment considerably more so than leaving money in bank deposit.

To say that money would have been better off in a bank deposit for those that didn't sell before the crash is so obvious it serves no purpose saying it. That is like saying if you put your unprotected hand in a fire it will be burnt. Oh really!

The immature language of 'ramp' 'pump and dump' is not part of my vocabulary it lowers the serious business of capitalism to playground banter and punters. What is closer to the truth is after the profit downgrade and 15-16 1/2 yearly I posted comments to the effect of 'SGH is probably too risky even though I was prepared to take that risk'. Yes I remained positive for a while thereafter but I don't know how that can be construed to encourage anyone else, especially when on occasions I gave my opinion. that it was too risky.

The irony in all this is, I recall you posting in the past about disliking people that deceive and post mistruths. Yet you persistently misquote and misrepresent my contribution to this board. It seems you can't possibly accept responsibility for an investment decision that went sour - it must be someone else's fault and Doc seems a good candidate to pin it on! Pretty humorous when all said and done!