the argument is not about what happens to R&D Bio stocks when they prove their science - we all know what happens then.
My argument is about posts which make the assumption that IMU will be successful without any proof, then construct elaborate fantasies about what happens next. Why bother posting if your initial premise assumes what needs to be proven?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- A look back: The Expert Briefing on 13 Nov 17
the argument is not about what happens to R&D Bio stocks when...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add IMU (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
3.8¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $386.7M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 1050000 | 3.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
3.7¢ | 134148 | 3 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
18 | 5665336 | 0.018 |
14 | 3997559 | 0.017 |
6 | 2974375 | 0.016 |
10 | 3219799 | 0.015 |
4 | 497500 | 0.014 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.019 | 400000 | 2 |
0.020 | 5410946 | 12 |
0.021 | 8494780 | 17 |
0.022 | 8757253 | 13 |
0.023 | 4826614 | 8 |
Last trade - 09.13am 26/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
IMU (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable