exploration carries risk .........
so EMV is a reasonable method to assess value .......
in Oz - most of the fields are smallish ......say 2-5mm bbl.'s .......risk circa 30-40%.......cost (onshore 3-7m)......
in shale / CSM type plays - resource is stated as % Rf * GIP / sq km's (or metric equiv)........HOWEVER - the flow rate per well and EUR/well have a range of outcomes ......so its a distribution curve ................
there are quite a few good stufies in the USA to highlight this ........
http://www.aie.org.au/AIE/Documents/APPEA-Cost-Report_Final.pdf
this is quite old - but does show how costs escalated with OP .........
the "development costs" are irrelevant .........(b/c it depends on what the stuff is and what scale (ie export vs dom market) .......
the "F" part of the curve highlights the maturity of Oz exploration .........
rgds
V_H
exploration carries risk ......... so EMV is a reasonable method...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 33 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add STO (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$7.02 |
Change
0.180(2.63%) |
Mkt cap ! $23.02B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $6.94 | $7.03 | $6.91 | $81.59M | 11.66M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 125302 | $7.01 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $7.02 | 766 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 30/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| STO (ASX) Chart |