It is a fact that INL has very bad history & has destroyed...

It is a fact that INL has very bad history & has destroyed massive wealth ( it must be the Tassie curse that BSM didn't escape either)
It was a money munching machine.
Earlier holders before the 10:1 consolidation were wiped out....With a little help from a parasite called La Jolla Cove.
This is past tense , but it will always leave a bad taste to those that are still holding from the glory days.
The current board made every effort to sever the ties to the old Intec....A few remnants still exist ( BSM holding & royalties , IIP royalties ,Zeehan Zinc slag dump....Small assets that could be monetized)
It now has a real business (albeit small) & resonable asset base.
There is evidence of cost cutting (INL hasn't raised cash since 2012)
SciDev may be profitable , but "corporate" INL is not.....It is still cash flow negative & running at a loss.
I must add that the market is taking notice of this dog....Up 150% from the low of 0.006 a few months ago....It is among the recent outperformers.....A very admirable effort from a so much hated outfit.