It has nothing to do with revenge. It has everything to do with transparency, informing shareholders what the real situation is.
You should be able to realise that the date has been pushed back once again and it requires regulatory approval.
You ,should agree that shareholders should be properly informed? Do you not?
I would like to point out that you have never been properly informed IMO.
Why did it take so long to tell the shareholders about the VA.
It was placed into va on the 24th of dec 2014 yet shareholders were only told about it on the 16th of jan.
I also want to remind shareholders that this reverse take over was originally supposed to have taken place in october 2014.
As a shareholder are you happy with how the company has been ran?
Are you happy that this company has not informed you as to the real financial situation and consequence of the va?
The recent announcements a not accurate and if you have the admins reports you can see that for yourself.I can only guess that you are upset that your investment hasn't gone how you thought it would or you are closer to the situation than you might make out.
If you notice all of Conidi's companies and related companies all reflect a downturn in confidence by investors since march 2015.
We have had many people talk about what sort of people are running this company and none of it is positive.
CAJ's share price has fallen from $1 to a mere 12.5 cents.
There are many other things that should raise your suspicions, like the metal printer that 3dm and 333d claim as their own. No there isn't 2 printers, there is one.
Are you happy that some of the ip does not belong to this company and can be given to any competitor if jason choses to do that?
Are you happy that the company has not told you about some 100k+ in assets being abandoned at the factory in Thomastown. The same factory that they refused to pay rent in?
Do you approve that sort of behaviour? Because you know that is a just a reflection of the behaviour of the 3 directors and this sort of behaviour hold a real legal risk.
Are you happy that this has cost the shareholders all this time and well over 100k OF YOUR MONEY?
Not some people that don't have a proper business acumen might think that this sort of thing is ok, I don't. I think that ASIC have a responsibility and an obligation to act of any breaches of the 2001 corporations act.
Do you want to live in a country where people can break the law and get away with it?
So you also realise that as a director, Jason should've had a proper picture of the company's financial affairs? Yet the documents that have been published clearly show that Jason was given false financial info on the day before va as they do not reflect documents that were published at a later date.
Look it up, you might need to buy an asic document of 2 but it is there.
If you want any conformation. you could ask Jason himself, He is more than happy to share the info he has with anyone that wants it.
You really should read up on the valid use of VA, i can tell you that VA is not to be used to gain an advantage in the way it has been used.
This is actually a very important part of com law and is covered in sections 82 (
Obtaining financial advantage by deception) and 85 (
False statements by company directors etc.) of the 1958 crimes act. Looks it up. Anyone found guilty this can hold a very harsh penalty.
It actually says A person who by any deception dishonestly obtains for himself or another any financial advantage is guilty of an indictable
offence and liable to level 5 imprisonment (10 years maximum).
