No, of course. So now you’re being evasive, taking my post out of context. I was comparing mineralisation style and ore morphology between the Wits 2.0 and the BBX deposits, using the grades and tonnes to illustrate my point.
Feel free to argue the points discussed instead of being flippant.
18 months ago I used the rock chip sampling results and the geological evidence to correctly predict that drilling would find huge amounts of high grade mineralisation. As it turns out, the mineralisation is in quantities far greater than I would have dared to imagine. I used an ore:waste ratio of 10% but right now it’s at 100%.
Now I’m using the drilling results we have and the additional geological evidence to predict that drilling will continue finding huge amounts of high grade mineralisation at depth and along- and across-strike for kilometres.