still voting no, page-13

Any idea of what Ash Creek might cost to develop? I was assuming it would be a smaller development (50% roughly) to the old Grieve phase 1 development plan. Is this fair? If we expect oil flows from Grieve in 12 months then on a corporate level i feel Ash Creek is therefore effectively funded as well in a timely fashion.

From the start this raising appeared driven by the Substantials and Healy's proposed take up outlined in the AGM resolutions makes it pretty clear that is the case. So as it is a forgone conclusion i would rather concentrate on how we can make money going forward.