PRW 0.00% 0.1¢ proto resources & investments ltd

for whom the bell tolls, page-3

  1. 603 Posts.
    kenreynolds

    I appreciate the point you are trying to make. However, if the benefits of the Barrier tech were substantial enough at 250ktpa there would be no talk of needing ("required") to scale-up.

    You also raised another point - MFC has just done a "feasibility study" which does not include the key piece of technology which is supposed to make the whole process feasible.

    Maybe it just me being cynical, but MFC/PRW are like underperforming school students; always handing their work in late, and never admitting prior to deadline they are having completion problems. And what they do hand in doesn't contain the course material covered.

    For example, on this subject (April 2011) "Proto has been informed by Metals Finance that the Feasibility Study and Detailed Engineering Study for the Barnes Hill Development is advancing with both studies slated for completion in mid-2011". http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20110428/pdf/41y8wnbrdyl441.pdf

    Hey, I don't have a dog in this fight, but PRW/MFC just seem to bring out my inner Pierpont. Pip! Pip!

 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add PRW (ASX) to my watchlist

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.