More unwarranted downramping against WGO
the Rio Tinto Gabonese tenaments referred to seemed to be those in another thread on HC. These are near the end of the SDL railway rather than near the start
Why would SDL give preference to Rio Tinto when the RIO tenaments would only require 1/3 of the SDL railway length to port
Obviously, SDL would give preference to WGO over RIO because WGO would pay fees to SDL for the entire length of their railway
No brainer, if you ask me
So have you bought into WGO yet, Westcott?
better than sdl: market cap $50m drilling july, page-33
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 61 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
