MAS 0.00% 0.0¢ mesa minerals limited

p/e ratio - evaluation

  1. 12 Posts.
    Lets try the P/E Evaluation route on Mesa Minerals


    Costs

    Mesa JV costs are likely to be sub A$5/00 per unit, why?

    OMH are targeting C1 costs of A3.50/unit at a larger scale But, Mesa JV has

    + Simple Mining
    + No dewater problems
    + Low Strip ratio
    + Simple crush and screen processing, no high power beneficiation or tailings
    = Similar distance to port
    = Similar remote location costs
    = Similar product grade
    - Marginally higher shipping costs Port Hedland vs Darwin to China

    Although at 350,000 tpa fixed costs will hurt the Mesa JV on a per unit basis

    Revenue

    From OMH Annual report (April 29) Mn Sales are at U$6.50+ / unit
    US Exchange rate 0.92
    So Revenue is A$7.07/unit

    Earnings

    Earnings per unit 7.07 5.00 = A$ 2.07/unit

    Total earnings is therefore 350,000 tonnes x 38 % x 2% moisture = 13,034,000 Mn Units

    So total earnings is A$ 26,980,380 or A$ 13,490,190 each for the JV Partners (Mesa Minerals and Auvex)

    Mesa Minerals have 615,660,831 shares

    Or an EPS of 2.19 c/share

    Now

    OMH are trading at a P/E of 34.6
    MIN are trading at a P/E of 18.8

    So lets apply a P/E Ratio of 15 to Mesa Minerals

    So the Mesa Minerals share price should be 15 x 2.19 = 32.87 c/share

    Conclusions

    1. The current offer by Mineral Resources is woefully inadequate and opportunistic
    2. The current Board is selling us out when they should be getting on with the business of operating a mine and selling manganese
    3. We need a change in management to realise real value for MAS shareholders.
    4. Vote No to Mineral Resources offer and
    5. Vote Yes to the Requisitioning Shareholder vote to Replace the Board on May 28.

    Just my thoughts
    Do your own Research
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add MAS (ASX) to my watchlist

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.