hi spiderman
interesting call about it been all over in three weeks.
Problem is this is only final submissions. Judge will not come back with a decision for months so expect to see this drag on for months yet.
So far your calls about CHM demise have been a touch wrong.
Glyna I love your call about MMX been an innocent party but MMX had to prove that. Oh that right the management team at the time didnt want to take the stand.
If MMX was an innocent party here is something to explain.
Go to ASX web site. Look up historical searches on Weboz,Nicu,MMX and explain how MMX went from a suspended company not capable of paying its listing fee's to returning with this deal done.
MMX was no innocent party but a key party in this grubby affair. As to proving it. Well CHM laid out its evidence and its witnesses took to the stand.
MMX well like rats off a sinking ship their witnesses decided not to take the stand.
Their defence from what I can find out turned into a quantum arguement not trying to disprove what happened.
What happened to the "without foundation" claim. I wonder if ASX will review that one given it was made during the middle of a takeover.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CHM
- pump and dump?
pump and dump?, page-14
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 21 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CHM (ASX) to my watchlist