mak offer doesn't recognise benefit of 75%, page-21

Makattack, money was always the main factor but now it's slid to the back of the pack. Yes it's business but I don't have to do business with people that don't impress me so why should I make it easy for MAK to get my shares? They've never put up a persuasive case for me to want to be a MAK shareholder and it's gotten worse this week by adding attempted intimidation to the spruiking.

Show me the money, show me some facts to make me change my mind. Where's the FS and BFS since it's supposedly so advanced? Why have they managed to get no significant shareholders to commit to them despite trawling all over the world? Why does it seem to be so tricky for prospective customers to determine if their DSO is suitable? What are their true costs of production with the studies to back them up? With none of that they are barely more advanced than Sandpiper/Meob, maybe less so since UCL has managed to get significant partners on board and prove up low mining costs.

You say not to fall in love with a stock but your nick is makattack! Come on man, you're a reasonable poster but surely you can see there has been very little of substance released to back the rhetoric out of MAK. Why should I trust them? What about the way they do business is so credible in your mind?