Ann: Substantial holding disclosure, page-21

Are you saying that BRL was not buying aggressively in the past because they were allowing Talley's to buy up shares in the market? It seems more like Talley's picked up the 100 million shares being offered. That trade was executed through Credit Suisse...so the buyer was well heeled...i.e. Talley's. But BRL's obligations seemed geared to the Singapore gang. So why step away when a Singapore fund was selling?

What is very clear is that BRL is now really buying shares as if their life depended on it. Despite all their previous loud claims of not being partial to any shareholder, that is not what their actions are showing.