Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Massive Flat Earth Disinfo Campaign!! To Discredit Investigation!, page-41

First 41 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
ptw

922 Posts.

64

26/03/19

22:16

Post #: 37893313
Share

Originally posted by Menta ↑

NASA refers to “a stationary atmosphere over a flat, non-rotating earth” from page 30 of the “NASA Reference Publication 1207 – August 1988″…3. CONCLUDING REMARKS‘This report derives and defines a set of linearized system matrices for a rigid aircraft of constant mass, flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat, nonrotating earth.’

This first NASA document accounts for atmospheric conditions and how to perform the calculations. There are no other assumptions or vague language. In the second paragraph of the referenced section of the report, it states that the linear model that the report covers makes no assumptions.They did however very specifically and intentionally say in clear language “This report derives and defines a set of linearized system matrices for a rigid aircraft of constant mass, flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat, nonrotating earth.”

https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88104main_H-1391.pdf

They can fool the people, but it's simply too dangerous to fool pilots. Using globe Earth calculations, for example, if you were flying from Sydney to Perth you would travel a distance of 2034 miles.The alleged Earth curvature over that distance should be 522.37 miles (8" per mile squared as per the globe Earth model). That means that unless the pilot constantly dipped the nose of the plane down towards the ground as he flew, by the time he reached Perth he would be flying at an altitude of 522.37 miles or 2,758,113 feet higher than he should be!

The reason pilots are not taught to correct for the Earth's curvature is simple. There is no curvature!NASA documents show the earth is flat and non-rotating on at least 15 separate official aeronautics documents. Here are the links from the video to the official NASA documents (any inactive links have since been removed from the public domain)....
01-page 12:"aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over flat nonrotating earth"https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88072main_H-1259.pdf02-page 108:"aircraft flying over flat, nonrotating earth"https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/…/casi.ntrs.n...03-page 126:"The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations sith stationary atmosphere and flat, nonrotating earth assumptions."https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/…/casi.ntrs.n...04-page 2:"The method is limited, however, to application where a flat, nonrotating earth may be assumed. "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/…/casi.ntrs.n...05-page 11:"The nonlinear equations of motion used in this model are general six-degree-of-freedom equations representing the flight dynamics of a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat nonrotating earth"https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88248main_H-1777.pdf06-page 32:"Lastly, the equations of motion for the zeroth-order problem of flight in a vacuum over a flat Earth are presented."https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/…/casi.ntrs.n...07-page 2:"In this paper, the rigid body equations of motion over a flat non-rotating earth "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/…/casi.ntrs.n...08-page 14:"The earth is flat and non-rotating." https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/…/casi.ntrs.n...09-page 25:"The helicopter equations of motion are given in body axes with rerpect toa flat, nonrotating Earth."https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/…/casi.ntrs.n...10-page 13:"A model frequently used is that of a flat, nonrotating earth."https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/…/casi.ntrs.n...11-page 19:"These equations assume a rigid vehicle and a flat, nonrotating Earth."https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88733main_H-2465.pdf12-page 9:"For aircraft problems, the state and measurement models together represent the kinematics of a rigid body for describing motion over a flat, nonrotating Earth"https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/…/casi.ntrs.n...13-page 14:"A flat, nonrotating earth"https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/…/casi.ntrs.n...14-page 2:"In our minimum time-to-climb problem, the aircraft is modeled as a point mass and the flight trajectory is strictly confined in a vertical plane on a non-rotating, flat earth."https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/…/casi.ntrs.n...15-page 8:"the missile position in space is computed relative to a flat nonrotating earth."https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/…/casi.ntrs.n...

Expand

Bwahahaha......they're not suggesting the earth is flat and non-rotating. They use that as the basis for the model on which the whole paper is based, that's why it's stated as linear......lol.......did you also miss the part about constant mass, seriously What's next? Nasa not only believes the earth is flat and non-rotating, but planes capable of Mach velocity don't burn fuel.....

No more 'shrooms.....
7 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

The winners & losers on market if negative gearing were gone

TI1

Coda Minerals (ASX:COD) enters rights issue to further exploration in South Australia

DEG

HotCopper users muse on De Grey's denial of Agnico Eagle takeover bid – but who are Agnico?

ACW

Actinogen Medical ramps up Alzheimer’s treatment trials, targeting fast-track global approvals

NAG

ACCC seeks Olam divestments before it can buy Namoi Cotton

GQG

KalGold rolls out detailed aeromagnetic survey across Pinjin project

AIM

5.6g/t gold intercept at Serbia's Rogozna supports Strickland's hopes for high-grade core

The market's shrugged at China's stimulus measures all year. Why is this one different?

Week 39 Wrap: What HotCopper’s watching; China’s new stimmy moves boost metals; Oz CPI drop

ESK

Estrella first foreign entity to win tenements in Timor-Leste under new laws ahead of 2025 tenders

There are more pages in this discussion • 20 more messages in this thread...

First 41 Last

SPONSORED BY