Useful rain Central Oz - headlines on ABC of course, page-7

  1. 1,148 Posts.
    Charlie, we know where it comes from. Part of the Crusher crew and the Rapid Response Network development was to "drown out" the people that disagree with AGW.

    That might be an ok thing to do if you perhaps had just one single precaution be correct. But when you have donuts, you then forget all the rules and become abusive to posters.

    Have you notice how they post all over social media and on every forum, as if they have some god given right to talk over everyone.

    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/1481/1481638-6ca444e68fc152a8a434c4f95c178650.jpg

    So this man started it, and it has grown from there, despite not one single prediction being correct, he and his many minions still carry on as if the Earth has 12 years to go before it ends.

    The real question is, what is the game plan now that the modern warming period is over? They can adjust after 1979 due to UAH, which is why they have kept the 1951-1980 baseline, against WMO regulations.

    They cant do that after 2020, they have no choice to move to 1991 - 2020, and measure against a much warmer baseline. Given the multiple La Ninas coming over the next 5 years, this will not end well, and the 25 year push will again be back by 2023, and a short pause is already coming back now.

    Clearly people can see this is scam, and countries know they have to choose between continuing the scam, and bankrupting their economies. When it's continues to get colder, people will die en masse in the NH mostly, and hopefully people hold these decision makers accountable.

    Anyway, other thing too is that these people want to distract form the topic at hand, only a complete and utter imbecile with an IQ of his shoe size would argue the BOMS forecast for March was a good one for QLD, given we are are breaking daily records, and seeing a years worth of rain by the end of the week.

    You have to wonder how dumb these Getup trolls think people are, do they think the public is stupid? One thing people are good at, is seeing a scam. It's pretty simple, lets have a referendum.

    If you believe in AGW, you to forego you car, all technology, all appliances in your house that create emissions, and that basically everything. And hunt for your food, we cant have people using plastic cups and plates, or cooking unless it's a camp fire.

    So lets take it too a vote, and which one would win do you think?



 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.