thanks for posting - and an interesting article and worth thinking about..
in another post watso wrote the following
maybe she views herself as a reincarnation of Winston Churchill, and her speech writers want to portray her as some sort of martin luther king..
ok watso is only assuming that it was speechwriters that wrote her words - but it would not surprise .. eg gillard's misogyny speech was supposed to have been written by a man.
....
She was merely repeating the words and sentiments put there by some male, a male who saw political advantage in her saying what she said. If he did not think there was political advantage, she would not have said what she said. It’s the reverse of the politics of conviction. It is the politics of the con.
http://catallaxyfiles.com/2012/12/17/gillards-misogyny-speech-was-written-by-a-man/"
He will be, when I speak, nameless He may have sought notoriety, but we in New Zealand we will give him nothing,."
maybe her words will go down as the nameless speech.
anyway of more interest is
WILL WINKS WIN HER NEXT RACE??
and straight from the horses mouth the answer is a resounding
YES.
