I've not commented on "poleward stormfronts, expanding Hadley cell, rising gpt [ozone] and much much more [in relation to the polar vortex]" So, no, I've not said anything different (about those) compared to what you claim the IPCC has said.
I've simply posted recent science papers on observations of the current wobbliness of the polar vortex, how that has affected northern hemisphere climate, and science papers on the possible causes of that related to warming.
One thing you often seem to have a problem with is you think that if the science says A, and also says B, you see contradiction, where the actual case is simply that both A and B are happening.
the thesis that the polar vortex is affected by the temperature differential between the equator and the pole is well founded. And that varies with global cooling and warming. so whatever caused cooling from 1940-1970, which the science states was aerosol pollution, and which state you choose not to believe, had a different effect from the observed warming since 1970. So while you seem to see a big contradiction there I don't. There are sound arguments for why you see the polar vortex going one way with cooling and the other with warming.
